p3xflag cmv14 braf wt Search Results


99
New England Biolabs backbone vector p3xflag cmv14
Backbone Vector P3xflag Cmv14, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/HindIII/ppr0786839-203-18-36
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
backbone vector p3xflag cmv14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc n a p3xflag cmv 14 3xha sugp1 e554k
N A P3xflag Cmv 14 3xha Sugp1 E554k, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/3xHA-miniTurbo-NLS_pCDNA3+(Plasmid+%23107172)/pm37402368-222-227-259
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
n a p3xflag cmv 14 3xha sugp1 e554k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc p3xflag cmv14 c myc wt construct
P3xflag Cmv14 C Myc Wt Construct, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/p3xFLAG+CMV14+%2F+BRAF+(Plasmid+%23131710)/pm40588481-353-1-14
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p3xflag cmv14 c myc wt construct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc flag ulk1
Flag Ulk1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/p3xFLAG-CMV14-mULK1+(Plasmid+%2324301)/pmc09282834-133-21-22
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flag ulk1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Addgene inc v600e mutant
(A) Silencing efficiency of four perfect-match, BRAF-targeting crRNAs at 48h post-knock-in of WT (grey) or <t>V600E</t> (purple BRAF variants, normalised against crNT. (B) Systematic mutagenesis of non-selective crBRAF-1 was used to engineer V600E-selective crRNAs. Sequences for each crRNA are shown below the barplot; the “U” nucleotide (in red) indicates the uracil in the spacer sequence that basepairs with the target V600E but not with the WT BRAF RNA, and the coloured nucleotides show the position of an additional mismatch introduced at various spacer locations through mutagenesis. Barplot shows silencing efficiency of crBRAF-1 and its mutagenesis derivatives against BRAF-WT (grey) vs BRAF-V600E (purple), normalised against crNT at 48h post-transfection. crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE 5 -MM 11,15 (orange arrows) show the highest selectivity against BRAF V600E. (C) Delta silencing efficiencies between WT (grey) and V600E (purple) variants for the top-performing crRNAs, indicating the degree of SNV-specificity. Schematics depicting the sequence and basepairing configuration of crE5-MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 with WT vs V600E-mutant BRAF mRNA targets are shown adjacent. (D) Dose-response curves derived from titration of parental crBRAF-1, crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 against WT (grey) or V600E (purple) BRAF at 48h post-transfection. For all graphs in A-C, individual data points show averaged fluorescence intensity from eight representative fields of view (n=3 independent experiments), and error bars show mean ± SD. (E) Silencing efficiency assessed by WB in HEK293T cells transfected with PspCas13b and full-length WT or SNV constructs. (F) Silencing efficiency assessed by RT-qPCR in cancer cell lines (A375 melanoma and HCT116 colorectal cancer) which endogenously express the SNV-containing oncogene (mean ± SD from n=3 independent experiments). Statistical significance was determined using unpaired t-tests, where * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
V600e Mutant, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/p3xFLAG+CMV14+%2F+BRAF-V600E+(Plasmid+%23131723)/bio_rxiv__2023__09__26__557083-198-39-42
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
v600e mutant - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Addgene inc p3xflag cmv 14
(A) Silencing efficiency of four perfect-match, BRAF-targeting crRNAs at 48h post-knock-in of WT (grey) or <t>V600E</t> (purple BRAF variants, normalised against crNT. (B) Systematic mutagenesis of non-selective crBRAF-1 was used to engineer V600E-selective crRNAs. Sequences for each crRNA are shown below the barplot; the “U” nucleotide (in red) indicates the uracil in the spacer sequence that basepairs with the target V600E but not with the WT BRAF RNA, and the coloured nucleotides show the position of an additional mismatch introduced at various spacer locations through mutagenesis. Barplot shows silencing efficiency of crBRAF-1 and its mutagenesis derivatives against BRAF-WT (grey) vs BRAF-V600E (purple), normalised against crNT at 48h post-transfection. crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE 5 -MM 11,15 (orange arrows) show the highest selectivity against BRAF V600E. (C) Delta silencing efficiencies between WT (grey) and V600E (purple) variants for the top-performing crRNAs, indicating the degree of SNV-specificity. Schematics depicting the sequence and basepairing configuration of crE5-MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 with WT vs V600E-mutant BRAF mRNA targets are shown adjacent. (D) Dose-response curves derived from titration of parental crBRAF-1, crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 against WT (grey) or V600E (purple) BRAF at 48h post-transfection. For all graphs in A-C, individual data points show averaged fluorescence intensity from eight representative fields of view (n=3 independent experiments), and error bars show mean ± SD. (E) Silencing efficiency assessed by WB in HEK293T cells transfected with PspCas13b and full-length WT or SNV constructs. (F) Silencing efficiency assessed by RT-qPCR in cancer cell lines (A375 melanoma and HCT116 colorectal cancer) which endogenously express the SNV-containing oncogene (mean ± SD from n=3 independent experiments). Statistical significance was determined using unpaired t-tests, where * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
P3xflag Cmv 14, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/GIV-WT+-+FLAG+(Plasmid+%2365947)/pmc05154557-1049-2-3
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p3xflag cmv 14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
Addgene inc p3xflag cmv14 foxo3a construct
(A) Silencing efficiency of four perfect-match, BRAF-targeting crRNAs at 48h post-knock-in of WT (grey) or <t>V600E</t> (purple BRAF variants, normalised against crNT. (B) Systematic mutagenesis of non-selective crBRAF-1 was used to engineer V600E-selective crRNAs. Sequences for each crRNA are shown below the barplot; the “U” nucleotide (in red) indicates the uracil in the spacer sequence that basepairs with the target V600E but not with the WT BRAF RNA, and the coloured nucleotides show the position of an additional mismatch introduced at various spacer locations through mutagenesis. Barplot shows silencing efficiency of crBRAF-1 and its mutagenesis derivatives against BRAF-WT (grey) vs BRAF-V600E (purple), normalised against crNT at 48h post-transfection. crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE 5 -MM 11,15 (orange arrows) show the highest selectivity against BRAF V600E. (C) Delta silencing efficiencies between WT (grey) and V600E (purple) variants for the top-performing crRNAs, indicating the degree of SNV-specificity. Schematics depicting the sequence and basepairing configuration of crE5-MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 with WT vs V600E-mutant BRAF mRNA targets are shown adjacent. (D) Dose-response curves derived from titration of parental crBRAF-1, crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 against WT (grey) or V600E (purple) BRAF at 48h post-transfection. For all graphs in A-C, individual data points show averaged fluorescence intensity from eight representative fields of view (n=3 independent experiments), and error bars show mean ± SD. (E) Silencing efficiency assessed by WB in HEK293T cells transfected with PspCas13b and full-length WT or SNV constructs. (F) Silencing efficiency assessed by RT-qPCR in cancer cell lines (A375 melanoma and HCT116 colorectal cancer) which endogenously express the SNV-containing oncogene (mean ± SD from n=3 independent experiments). Statistical significance was determined using unpaired t-tests, where * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
P3xflag Cmv14 Foxo3a Construct, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/p3xFLAG+CMV14+%2F+BRAF-G596C+(Plasmid+%23131712)/pmc05833443-206-1-16
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p3xflag cmv14 foxo3a construct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Shanghai GenePharma p3xflag-cmv-14 vector
(A) Silencing efficiency of four perfect-match, BRAF-targeting crRNAs at 48h post-knock-in of WT (grey) or <t>V600E</t> (purple BRAF variants, normalised against crNT. (B) Systematic mutagenesis of non-selective crBRAF-1 was used to engineer V600E-selective crRNAs. Sequences for each crRNA are shown below the barplot; the “U” nucleotide (in red) indicates the uracil in the spacer sequence that basepairs with the target V600E but not with the WT BRAF RNA, and the coloured nucleotides show the position of an additional mismatch introduced at various spacer locations through mutagenesis. Barplot shows silencing efficiency of crBRAF-1 and its mutagenesis derivatives against BRAF-WT (grey) vs BRAF-V600E (purple), normalised against crNT at 48h post-transfection. crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE 5 -MM 11,15 (orange arrows) show the highest selectivity against BRAF V600E. (C) Delta silencing efficiencies between WT (grey) and V600E (purple) variants for the top-performing crRNAs, indicating the degree of SNV-specificity. Schematics depicting the sequence and basepairing configuration of crE5-MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 with WT vs V600E-mutant BRAF mRNA targets are shown adjacent. (D) Dose-response curves derived from titration of parental crBRAF-1, crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 against WT (grey) or V600E (purple) BRAF at 48h post-transfection. For all graphs in A-C, individual data points show averaged fluorescence intensity from eight representative fields of view (n=3 independent experiments), and error bars show mean ± SD. (E) Silencing efficiency assessed by WB in HEK293T cells transfected with PspCas13b and full-length WT or SNV constructs. (F) Silencing efficiency assessed by RT-qPCR in cancer cell lines (A375 melanoma and HCT116 colorectal cancer) which endogenously express the SNV-containing oncogene (mean ± SD from n=3 independent experiments). Statistical significance was determined using unpaired t-tests, where * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
P3xflag Cmv 14 Vector, supplied by Shanghai GenePharma, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/p3xflag+cmv+14+vector/pmc06781729-34-17-19
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p3xflag-cmv-14 vector - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc p3xflag cmv 14 wdr5
(A) Silencing efficiency of four perfect-match, BRAF-targeting crRNAs at 48h post-knock-in of WT (grey) or <t>V600E</t> (purple BRAF variants, normalised against crNT. (B) Systematic mutagenesis of non-selective crBRAF-1 was used to engineer V600E-selective crRNAs. Sequences for each crRNA are shown below the barplot; the “U” nucleotide (in red) indicates the uracil in the spacer sequence that basepairs with the target V600E but not with the WT BRAF RNA, and the coloured nucleotides show the position of an additional mismatch introduced at various spacer locations through mutagenesis. Barplot shows silencing efficiency of crBRAF-1 and its mutagenesis derivatives against BRAF-WT (grey) vs BRAF-V600E (purple), normalised against crNT at 48h post-transfection. crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE 5 -MM 11,15 (orange arrows) show the highest selectivity against BRAF V600E. (C) Delta silencing efficiencies between WT (grey) and V600E (purple) variants for the top-performing crRNAs, indicating the degree of SNV-specificity. Schematics depicting the sequence and basepairing configuration of crE5-MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 with WT vs V600E-mutant BRAF mRNA targets are shown adjacent. (D) Dose-response curves derived from titration of parental crBRAF-1, crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 against WT (grey) or V600E (purple) BRAF at 48h post-transfection. For all graphs in A-C, individual data points show averaged fluorescence intensity from eight representative fields of view (n=3 independent experiments), and error bars show mean ± SD. (E) Silencing efficiency assessed by WB in HEK293T cells transfected with PspCas13b and full-length WT or SNV constructs. (F) Silencing efficiency assessed by RT-qPCR in cancer cell lines (A375 melanoma and HCT116 colorectal cancer) which endogenously express the SNV-containing oncogene (mean ± SD from n=3 independent experiments). Statistical significance was determined using unpaired t-tests, where * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
P3xflag Cmv 14 Wdr5, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/p3XFLAG-CMV-14-WDR5+(Plasmid+%2359974)/pmc06063525-147-0-2
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p3xflag cmv 14 wdr5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Capital Biosciences spt5-ha p3xflag-cmv14 vector
Knockdown of TFII-I releases RNAPII to transcribe GLI2. ( A ) Real time PCR showing GLI2 mRNA expression in PANC1 cells transfected with NT siRNA or siRNA targeting construct TFII-I and treated with vehicle or flavopiridol, an inhibitor of pause release. ( B ) Immunoprecipitation showing binding of endogenous TFII-I to <t>SPT5.</t> HepG2 cells transfected to express SPT5-HA and TFII-I-FLAG were immunoprecipitated with TFII-I antibody or nonspecific IgG control and then assayed by western blot. ( C ) ChIP assay was performed in HepG2 cells using an anti-NELF-A antibody. The data shows NELF-A I bind the INR of the GLI2 promoter, and that upon TFII-I knockdown endogenous NELF-A binding decreases at this region. These findings indicate TFII-I represses GLI2 gene transcription through RNAPII pausing. For this figure, N = 3 and the asterisk represents P ≤ 0.05.
Spt5 Ha P3xflag Cmv14 Vector, supplied by Capital Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p3xflag+cmv14+braf+wt/spt5+ha+p3xflag+cmv14+vector/pmc07367210-33-26-32
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spt5-ha p3xflag-cmv14 vector - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Silencing efficiency of four perfect-match, BRAF-targeting crRNAs at 48h post-knock-in of WT (grey) or V600E (purple BRAF variants, normalised against crNT. (B) Systematic mutagenesis of non-selective crBRAF-1 was used to engineer V600E-selective crRNAs. Sequences for each crRNA are shown below the barplot; the “U” nucleotide (in red) indicates the uracil in the spacer sequence that basepairs with the target V600E but not with the WT BRAF RNA, and the coloured nucleotides show the position of an additional mismatch introduced at various spacer locations through mutagenesis. Barplot shows silencing efficiency of crBRAF-1 and its mutagenesis derivatives against BRAF-WT (grey) vs BRAF-V600E (purple), normalised against crNT at 48h post-transfection. crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE 5 -MM 11,15 (orange arrows) show the highest selectivity against BRAF V600E. (C) Delta silencing efficiencies between WT (grey) and V600E (purple) variants for the top-performing crRNAs, indicating the degree of SNV-specificity. Schematics depicting the sequence and basepairing configuration of crE5-MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 with WT vs V600E-mutant BRAF mRNA targets are shown adjacent. (D) Dose-response curves derived from titration of parental crBRAF-1, crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 against WT (grey) or V600E (purple) BRAF at 48h post-transfection. For all graphs in A-C, individual data points show averaged fluorescence intensity from eight representative fields of view (n=3 independent experiments), and error bars show mean ± SD. (E) Silencing efficiency assessed by WB in HEK293T cells transfected with PspCas13b and full-length WT or SNV constructs. (F) Silencing efficiency assessed by RT-qPCR in cancer cell lines (A375 melanoma and HCT116 colorectal cancer) which endogenously express the SNV-containing oncogene (mean ± SD from n=3 independent experiments). Statistical significance was determined using unpaired t-tests, where * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Molecular principles of CRISPR-Cas13 mismatch intolerance enable selective silencing of point-mutated oncogenic RNA with single-base precision

doi: 10.1101/2023.09.26.557083

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Silencing efficiency of four perfect-match, BRAF-targeting crRNAs at 48h post-knock-in of WT (grey) or V600E (purple BRAF variants, normalised against crNT. (B) Systematic mutagenesis of non-selective crBRAF-1 was used to engineer V600E-selective crRNAs. Sequences for each crRNA are shown below the barplot; the “U” nucleotide (in red) indicates the uracil in the spacer sequence that basepairs with the target V600E but not with the WT BRAF RNA, and the coloured nucleotides show the position of an additional mismatch introduced at various spacer locations through mutagenesis. Barplot shows silencing efficiency of crBRAF-1 and its mutagenesis derivatives against BRAF-WT (grey) vs BRAF-V600E (purple), normalised against crNT at 48h post-transfection. crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE 5 -MM 11,15 (orange arrows) show the highest selectivity against BRAF V600E. (C) Delta silencing efficiencies between WT (grey) and V600E (purple) variants for the top-performing crRNAs, indicating the degree of SNV-specificity. Schematics depicting the sequence and basepairing configuration of crE5-MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 with WT vs V600E-mutant BRAF mRNA targets are shown adjacent. (D) Dose-response curves derived from titration of parental crBRAF-1, crE 5 -MM 8,15 and crE5-MM 11,15 against WT (grey) or V600E (purple) BRAF at 48h post-transfection. For all graphs in A-C, individual data points show averaged fluorescence intensity from eight representative fields of view (n=3 independent experiments), and error bars show mean ± SD. (E) Silencing efficiency assessed by WB in HEK293T cells transfected with PspCas13b and full-length WT or SNV constructs. (F) Silencing efficiency assessed by RT-qPCR in cancer cell lines (A375 melanoma and HCT116 colorectal cancer) which endogenously express the SNV-containing oncogene (mean ± SD from n=3 independent experiments). Statistical significance was determined using unpaired t-tests, where * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Cloning into MSCV-IRES reporter backbones encoding GFP (for BRAF-WT) or mCherry (for BRAF V600E and KRAS) was achieved via plasmid digestion, gel purification, and T4 ligation as previously described • Plasmids encoding full-length BRAF wildtype (p3xFLAG-CMV-BRAF, Addgene #131710) and V600E mutant (p3xFLAG-CMV-BRAF-V600E, Addgene #131723) were gifts from Jacques De Greve. (29)

Techniques: Knock-In, Mutagenesis, Sequencing, Transfection, Derivative Assay, Titration, Fluorescence, Construct, Quantitative RT-PCR

Knockdown of TFII-I releases RNAPII to transcribe GLI2. ( A ) Real time PCR showing GLI2 mRNA expression in PANC1 cells transfected with NT siRNA or siRNA targeting construct TFII-I and treated with vehicle or flavopiridol, an inhibitor of pause release. ( B ) Immunoprecipitation showing binding of endogenous TFII-I to SPT5. HepG2 cells transfected to express SPT5-HA and TFII-I-FLAG were immunoprecipitated with TFII-I antibody or nonspecific IgG control and then assayed by western blot. ( C ) ChIP assay was performed in HepG2 cells using an anti-NELF-A antibody. The data shows NELF-A I bind the INR of the GLI2 promoter, and that upon TFII-I knockdown endogenous NELF-A binding decreases at this region. These findings indicate TFII-I represses GLI2 gene transcription through RNAPII pausing. For this figure, N = 3 and the asterisk represents P ≤ 0.05.

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: TFII-I-mediated polymerase pausing antagonizes GLI2 induction by TGFβ

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa476

Figure Lengend Snippet: Knockdown of TFII-I releases RNAPII to transcribe GLI2. ( A ) Real time PCR showing GLI2 mRNA expression in PANC1 cells transfected with NT siRNA or siRNA targeting construct TFII-I and treated with vehicle or flavopiridol, an inhibitor of pause release. ( B ) Immunoprecipitation showing binding of endogenous TFII-I to SPT5. HepG2 cells transfected to express SPT5-HA and TFII-I-FLAG were immunoprecipitated with TFII-I antibody or nonspecific IgG control and then assayed by western blot. ( C ) ChIP assay was performed in HepG2 cells using an anti-NELF-A antibody. The data shows NELF-A I bind the INR of the GLI2 promoter, and that upon TFII-I knockdown endogenous NELF-A binding decreases at this region. These findings indicate TFII-I represses GLI2 gene transcription through RNAPII pausing. For this figure, N = 3 and the asterisk represents P ≤ 0.05.

Article Snippet: Plasmids utilized for experiments included a 3xFLAG-TFII-I expression vector corresponding to the TFII-I isoforms α, β, δ and γ (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ) and SPT5-HA in the p3xFLAG-CMV14 vector (original SPT5 sequence from Capital Biosciences in pORF).

Techniques: Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Expressing, Transfection, Construct, Immunoprecipitation, Binding Assay, Western Blot